European Journal of Health and Biology Education

European Journal of Health and Biology Education, 2018 - Volume 7 Issue 2, pp. 27-33
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejhbe/80727

Published Online: 15 Dec 2018

Views: 436 | Downloads: 165

The purpose of this research was to obtain data information of the Educational Program Evaluation Clinic at FK UKI, which is useful to know the extent to which the objectives of the clinical education program is achieved by knowing the effectiveness of each component and the results of research on each of these components can be used as well as consideration for decision makers. The method that was used in this research is the CIPP evaluation model, which evaluates the educational program with four components (context, input, process, and product) through the process of getting the data through interviews, questionnaires, the study of documents, and observation, then collected and tabulated the data presented qualitatively and quantitatively, reprocessed and analyzed using statistical methods/computer (SPSS). The results of this study lead to the conclusion that the evaluation of clinical education programs in FK UKI on almost all components run in accordance with the objectives of the educational programs, but there are still weaknesses in the input component that some academic staff do not have the second-degree master education.

program evaluation CIPP models clinical education

• Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safrudin Abdul Jabar, 2004, Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Praktisi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
• Edison, 2009, Penelitian dan Evaluasi Dalam Bidang Pendidikan: Evaluasi CIPP; http://ed150n5.blogspot.com/2009/04/evaluasi-cipp.html (dikses 03 Januari 2014)
• Evaluasi Program Sekolah. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2009.
• Guba, Egon G. and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 1983, Effective Evaluation, Improving the usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publisher.
• Hadari, Nawawi, Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial, 1995, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.
• Hadjar, 1999, Dasar-dasar Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif dalam Pendidikan.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
• http://fk.uki.ac.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13&Itemid=82, di unduh pada Februari 2013. http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kedokteran, diunduh 02 Agustus 2012
• http://simak.ui.ac.id/profil-prodi/pascasarjana/ilmu-kesehatan/ilmu-pendidikan-kedokteran, diunduh 2 Agustus 2012. http://ed150n5.blogspot.com/2009/04/evaluasi-cipp.html
• Kahan, Barbara dan Kael Consulting. 2008, Review of Evaluation Frameworks. Saskatchewan Ministry of Education.
• KONSIL KEDOKTERAN INDONESIA Indonesian Medical Council, Standar Pendidikan Profesi Dokter, Jakarta 2006.
• Kurikulum dan Silabi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, 2008.
• Madaus, George F., Michael S. Scriven, and Daniel L. Stufflebeam, 1985, Evaluation Model, Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation,. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.
• Mark, Melvin M. dan Debra J.Rog, 2010, The 2010 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. Program Officer and COTR Division of Research and Learning in Formal and Informal Settings National Science Foundation.
• Supardi. 2005, Metode Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
• Tayibnapis, Farida Y. 2008, Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
• Wilde, Judith PhD dan Suzanne Sockey, PhD, 1995, Evaluation Hanbook. Evaluation Assistance Center-Western Region.
• Wirawan, 2011, Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.